The 2024 Election IS Rigged!

October 16, 2024

The Demos’ master strategy to perpetuate control of the Executive and Legislative Branches – and ultimately state governments nationwide.

“We should be unfaithful to ourselves if we should ever lose sight of the danger to our liberties if anything partial or extraneous should infect the purity of our free, fair, virtuous, and independent elections.” —John Adams (1797)

After the 2020 election, Donald Trump declared: “We won. It was a rigged election.”

But he and his team completely missed what was rigged.

They blamed ballot-counting machines and ballot harvesting — no question the latter was happening. But an enormous amount of political capital was wasted complaining about ballot machines when the most brazen election rigging was hiding in plain sight: The Democrats’ bulk-mail ballot fraud strategy. Using the ChiCom Virus pandemic as cover, Democrats controlling some of the largest states sent ballots to the last known address of every person on voter rolls, with no authentication of who would be receiving those ballots, and virtually no authentication for who was actually casting those ballots.

In 2020, among 333 million Americans, almost 160 million (66%) of the nation’s 239.2 million “eligible voters” cast ballots, and millions were not authenticated.

Moreover, of the votes cast in 2020, 43% (66 million ballots) were by mail — and a majority of those were in states where authentication of the person receiving and casting the ballot was not required. Of all those who voted in person, 66% voted for Trump versus 42% for Biden — which is to say that 58% of Biden ballots, almost 47 million votes, were cast by mail.

Bulk-mail ballots accounted for the highest percentage of ballots cast in our nation’s history.

Do you see the pattern here?

Despite the bulk-mail ballots, Trump still received 46.9% of the vote (74,223,975) and 232 electoral votes, while 1.8% of votes (2,926,539) were for third-party candidates. And, election was closer than appearances would imply, though. Biden’s 7 million vote margin (81,283,501), giving him 306 electoral votes, was mostly those unauthenticated bulk-mail ballots in California and New York.

But Biden actually won the presidency by fewer than 43,000 votes in the key swing states of Arizona, Georgia, and Wisconsin. That is precisely why the Demos’ want to eliminate the Electoral College, eroding our constitutional republic into a democracy.

The lack of authenticated ballots, whether by mail or in person, significantly erodes the value of votes in states where authentication is mandated. Requiring voter IDs is the global standard, even in third-world countries. Short of universally requiring voter authentication, voter fraud will continue unabated, which completely undermines the integrity of elections.

If Democrats further institutionalize eliminating voter ID requirements for in-person and mail ballots, that will perpetuate Democrat control of the executive and legislative branches, which, of course, is their objective. That is precisely why the Demos’ House and Senate Resolutions 1 seek to nationalize a prohibition on voter ID requirements.

Beyond the ballot fraud, Trump’s “rigged election” rhetoric handed a huge bonus to the Democrat Party socialists — the January 6th Capitol riots by a bunch of jackass thugs inspired by other jackass thugs.

No, I am not talking about those who were foolishly trespassing and meandering through the Capitol building once its doors had been breached. I am talking about a few hundred protesters outside the building who were violently battling with police — hardly typical of 99.9% of Trump supporters.

The political optics that day were the ugliest in decades — and created an enormous political opportunity for Democrats.

The actions of a few hundred thugs enabled Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer to launch their histrionic “insurrection inquisition,” ultimately casting all Trump supporters as thugs. And they have continued to do so every day since.

The point is not to relitigate the J6 riots but to say that one residual of those riots is that the ugly events that day did more to disable Trump’s reelection bid now than anything else.

Here is what is most important to understand about the 2020 election and how it shaped the Democrats’ “permanent majority” strategy moving forward.

Demos had a three-prong strategy to defeat Trump’s prospects for a second term, and that triad now forms their template to defeat Republicans in both national and state elections moving forward.

The first prong is, in Trump’s case the use of deep state political hacks in the FBI and CIA to set him up for a takedown. That started with their fake Trump/Russia collusion conspiracy, which has its roots before Trump took office in 2017. Then, as part of the same strategy, ahead of the election, Demo Rep. Adam Schiff and his ilk attempted to impeach Trump for what Joe Biden actually did.

Part of this strategy is also the abject violation of rule of law with the two-tiered “justice” of lawfare prosecutions. those cases brought at the federal level by Merrick Garland’s lapdog Jack Smith and the state level by Alvin Brag.

On top of those measures, Demos fomented the summer of rage and riots based on their “systemic racism” lie. That fully primed their emotionally incontinent constituents with “Trump Derangement Syndrome.”

The second prong of the Demo strategy, in addition to the full advocacy of their massive Leftmedia platform publicists, was the systemic suppression of free speech by both the mainstream media and, by extension, across social media platforms.

Demonstrating how effective that speech suppression strategy was, just ahead of the 2020 election, Demos put into full motion a massive blackout of Joe “Big Guy” Biden’s ChiCom and Ukrainian pay-to-play influence-peddling schemes, exposed on Hunter Biden’s laptop. They used a letter from former intel officials aligned with this scheme, claiming the laptop was actually a “Russian disinformation” subterfuge in order to justify the mass media blackout.

It was modeled after what Demos had learned earlier in the year about how to collaborate with media platforms to suppress information about COVID.

Ultimately, of course, it was determined that the laptop and the incriminating information on it did belong to Hunter.

As former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy declared this week: “The enduring relevance of the laptop is not as a Biden story, but as a story of the political corruption of the government’s law-enforcement and intelligence apparatus — pillars of our rule of law and our national security.”

The third prong of the Demos’ permanent majority strategy is the proliferation of the aforementioned bulk-mail ballot fraud. The big winner in 2020 was systemic ballot fraud.

As for the integrity of in-person voting, according to current voter ID laws by state, Ballotpedia notes: “35 states required voters to present identification in order to vote at the polls on Election Day. Of these states, 24 required voters to present identification containing a photograph, and 11 accept other forms of identification.”

But here is the kicker: “The remaining 15 states do not require voters to present identification in order to vote at the polls on Election Day.”

The biggest states not requiring voter ID are Democrat-controlled: California, Illinois, New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania.

In fact, California’s Demo Gov. Gavin Newsom has officially banned requiring voter IDs anywhere in the state. Neighboring swing state Arizona’s Demo governor, Katie Hobbs, has approved more than 200,000 voters with unconfirmed citizenship.

And regarding illegal immigrants attempting to vote, Virginia’s Republican governor, Glenn Youngkin, is fighting a diversionary DoJ voter-roll lawsuit, saying, “With less than 30 days until the election, the Biden-Harris Department of Justice is filing an unprecedented lawsuit against me and the Commonwealth of Virginia, for appropriately enforcing a 2006 law signed by Democrat Tim Kaine that requires Virginia to remove noncitizens from the voter rolls.”

As for those “all-mail elections,” these are the current states that bulk-mail ballots: California, Colorado, Hawaii, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, Vermont, and Washington. Again, in most cases, there is virtually no authentication of who is receiving and who is returning millions of these bulk-mail ballots.

Bottom line: Any election that includes one unauthenticated vote should be declared null and void. The upcoming 2024 election will include millions of unauthenticated votes.

It is only recently that Trump is calling out the Democrat’s bulk-mail fraud strategy, insisting in various forums: “Anytime you have a mail-in ballot, there is going to be massive fraud. … We have a rigged election. … We have a bad voting system. We have mail-in ballots.”

Predictably, in a so-called “fact-check” on Trump’s assertion, the leftists at PBS claimed, “Mail-in voting provides more opportunity for fraud than in-person voting, but it’s still rare.”

Allow me to fact-check that claim: If you do not fully authenticate who is receiving and who is casting mail ballots, as is the case in many Democrat-controlled states, then there is no basis for asserting that fraud by mail is “rare.” Memo to PBS: Fact Check False.

And Leftmedia bulk-mail ballot defenders are piling on Trump with equally spurious fact-checks because they know this massive ballot fraud is key to the Demos’ permanent majority strategy.

Moreover, Demos claim that those who oppose their massive voter fraud schemes are denying “voter rights,” and those who question the adulterated outcomes are “election deniers.”

The old adage applies: “When you are taking a lot of fire, you must be directly over the target.”

Since the 2020 election, Democrats have mastered the three-prong strategy to perpetuate control of the Executive and Legislative Branches – and ultimately state governments nationwide – first, using their deep-state actors to attack Republicans; second, suppressing speech that does not comport with their agenda; and third, counting millions of unauthenticated ballots.

This template is firmly in place for the 2024 election in order to benefit the Harris/Walz ticket — that combo being both a bloody and perilous threat to American Liberty.

More than five million early ballots have already been counted, and not surprisingly, the majority are Democrat votes.

Despite Donald Trump’s considerable and well-documented record of domestic and foreign policy successes, a record that stands in stark contrast to the Biden/Harris regime’s abysmal record of domestic and foreign policy failures, the unfortunate reality is that this election is rigged.

All being said, this is an entirely different ballot field than in 2016, and if Trump and JD Vance pull this off, it will be nothing short of a miracle. Thus, this is a call to get out every Trump vote we can muster.

Semper Vigilans Fortis Paratus et Fidelis
Pro Deo et Libertate — 1776

Follow Mark Alexander on X/Twitter.

Comment | Share


Please join us in daily prayer for our Patriots in uniform — Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Marines, and Coast Guardsmen — standing in harm’s way in defense of American Liberty, and for Veterans, First Responders, and their families. Please lift up your Patriot team and our mission to support and defend our Republic’s Founding Principle of Liberty, in order to ignite the fires of freedom in the hearts and minds of our countrymen.

About Those Trump and Harris National Security Endorsements

Military and national security endorsements speak volumes about the competence of the Trump/Vance ticket versus the ineptitude of the Harris/Walz ticket.

“There is a rank due to the United States, among nations, which will be withheld, if not absolutely lost, by the reputation of weakness.” —George Washington (1793)

Over the last almost eight years, we have written about Donald Trump’s considerable and well-documented record of domestic and foreign policy successes. This record stands in stark contrast to the Biden/Harris regime’s abysmal record of domestic and foreign policy failures.

And again this week, Joe Biden declared that Kamala Harris was fully on board with his policies, saying, “She was a major player in everything we’ve done.”

With “friends” like Joe Biden…

Harris affirmed that assessment when asked this week if she would “have done something differently than President Biden during the past four years.” Harris replied, “There is not a thing that comes to mind in terms of, and I’ve been a part of, of, of most of the decisions that have had impact.”

Really, “not a thing”? This from the “change” candidate?

The Biden/Harris mounting record of failures is precisely why the Harris/Walz ticket has nothing else to run on other than vilifying their opponent as a “threat to democracy.”

Harris has established herself as a pathological liar, which is to say she tag teams well with Tim Walz, who, on top of his stolen valor record, also has a chronic problem with the truth.

In fact, this is precisely why, since Harris booted Biden to the curb, she has not held a press conference. Instead, she has been running a scripted campaign of deception, including mostly softball fan-base interviews.

Another way we determine the integrity of the Trump/Vance ticket versus the Harris/Walz ticket is to consider their endorsements. No, I am not talking about Elon Musk’s endorsement of Trump or Taylor Swift’s endorsement of Harris, though such endorsements do matter.

I am referring specifically to endorsements from military and national security officials and what those endorsements say about the respective candidates.

In September, Harris announced that a consortium of leftist deep state hacks issued an endorsement letter backing her. All you need to know about the integrity of that collective endorsement is that nine of the former top intelligence officials who signed on for Harris also signed the letter claiming, just weeks before the 2020 election, that Hunter Biden’s laptop was actually a “Russian disinformation” subterfuge.

That letter was used by Biden’s Leftmedia publicists as justification for the biggest pre-election media blackout in modern history. The purpose, of course, was to cover up the ChiCom and Ukrainian pay-to-play influence-peddling schemes involving the “Big Guy.” That subterfuge suppressed what would have otherwise been an election-altering “October Surprise.”

Ultimately, of course, it was determined that the laptop and the incriminating information on it did belong to Hunter, but not until the FBI had sat on the laptop for nearly a year.

As the Washington Examiner’s Jerry Dunleavy reported in August 2022, “The FBI slow-walked its investigation into Hunter Biden’s laptop, including telling some bureau employees not to look at the hard drive belonging to President Joe Biden’s son, according to reported whistleblower disclosures made public by a top Senate Republican.” That senator is Wisconsin’s Ron Johnson, the ranking member of the Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations.

Notably, the aforementioned deep state signatories and others also seeded the fake “Trump/Russia collusion” conspiracy.

The Harris endorsement letter is built on the same fake Biden/Harris/Walz claims about Trump being a threat to democracy. But what is abundantly clear from the hacks endorsing Harris is this: She and Walz are a perilous threat to both Liberty and national security.

Demonstrating her profound ineptitude, when asked this week to name the country she considers our greatest adversary, Harris responded: “I think there’s an obvious one in mind, which is Iran. Iran has American blood on their hands.”

Seriously.

That would be the same rogue Iranian regime that Barack Obama and Biden empowered with $400 million in palleted cash as part of their $1.7 billion nuclear appeasement (read: “nuclear empowerment”) plan. And the Biden/Harris regime has endeavored to reactivate the perilous Obama/Biden nuke deal. Helping Iran, the world’s leading state sponsor of Islamic terrorism, produce nukes, what could go wrong?

Oh, and don’t forget the $6 billion ransom payment Biden/Harris paid to Iran a year ago. Moreover, in March of this year, just six weeks after the Iran-backed drone attack that killed three American soldiers, Biden and Harris approved additional Iranian access to more than $10 billion in previously frozen assets.

Of course, debating Trump, Biden falsely claimed no troops died on his watch, much as Harris falsely claimed we have no troops in combat zones.

To be clear, obviously, the correct answer to the question regarding our most dangerous adversary is Red China. And for Harris to call out Iran and mention “blood on their hands” is astounding, given this administration’s bloody record in AfghanistanUkraine, and Israel. The slaughter of thousands of men, women, and children in those countries is on Harris’s hands.

But Harris keeps reminding everyone, “I think the most important and most significant aspect of my policy perspective and decisions is my values have not changed.”

The implications for our national security are nothing short of catastrophic.

On the other end of the national security competence spectrum, this week more than 200 former high-ranking military officers joined hundreds of other former national security and foreign policy officials (and, notably, Gold Star families) in endorsing Donald Trump in a public letter.

The letter affirms: “From a world at peace under President Trump, we are closer to a third world war than ever before under the Biden-Harris Administration. With multiple escalating wars around the world, an open border that allows terrorists to flood into the American homeland, and malign actors like China operating unabated, U.S. national security has been profoundly damaged by the failed policies of Kamala Harris and Joe Biden.”

The letter also included 40 former U.S. ambassadors and hundreds of officials from prior Republican administrations.

However, if you want to read the strongest and most reasoned condemnation of Harris and affirmation of Trump, see “An Election Open Letter to All Americans” from Gen. B.B. Bell, U.S. Army (Ret.). Bell, who is also a signer of the Trump endorsement letter, is a longtime member of The Patriot Post’s National Advisory Committee, and he served in uniform for almost four decades, including extended deployments overseas in both peace and war. He warned in summation, “For freedom’s sake, please reject this Marxist march to insanity and thus the destruction of these United States.”

Indeed.

For those contemplating casting a vote for the Harris/Walz ticket, as their body count mounts, this will be your last chance to wash the blood from your hands.

Semper Vigilans Fortis Paratus et Fidelis
Pro Deo et Libertate — 1776

From our Friends at the PatriotPost.us

(Updated)

Follow Mark Alexander on X/Twitter.

Constitution Day

“Done … the Seventeenth Day of September, in the year of our LORD one thousand seven hundred and eighty seven.”

September 17th is Constitution Day, marking the anniversary of the signing of our Republic’s Constitution at the Philadelphia Convention in 1787. It is the most consequential governing document in history of mankind, a dramatic departure from the rule of tyrants over the course of all preceding generations, and standing in stark contrast to those totalitarian regimes which have risen since. It codified and enshrined the foundation of American Liberty enumerated in our Declaration of Independence, providing the assurance that Rule of Law would prevail over rule of men, the terminus of the latter irrevocably being tyranny.

We are the beneficiaries of generations of American Patriots who pledged their lives, fortunes, and sacred honor “to support and defend” that Liberty.

Thus, we invite you to honor this historic event and its enduring legacy by reading our treatise on American Liberty. Keep the flame of Liberty burning bright by promoting the civic knowledge of Liberty for all those in your sphere of influence. We offer an excellent resource for that purpose, our highly acclaimed “Patriot’s Primer on American Liberty” pocket guides, which are available for bulk purchase and distribution to students, grassroots organizations, civic clubs, political gatherings, military and public service personnel, professional associations, and others.

As the current generation of American Patriots, we hold all elected representatives accountable to abide by their solemn oaths “to Support and Defend” our Constitution.

Constitution Day also marks The Patriot Post’s anniversary, and we are grateful to you, our fellow Patriots, for your financial support of our mission and operations budget in order to extend Liberty to the next generation.

Other resources:

Read Alexander’s treatise on American Liberty and our sacred obligation to “To Support and Defend” our Constitution.

Visit Alexander’s archive of columns on the Constitution, specifically those on Liberty and on our Republic’s First Principles.

The ‘Unalienable Rights of Man’ — A Civics Lesson

The Federalist Papers

The Bill of Rights: ‘To Secure These Rights’

The 50 U.S. State Constitutions on God

Constitutional Interpretation

A ‘Living Constitution’ for a Dying Republic

Judicial Supremacists and the Despotic Branch

Rule of Law vs. rule of men


Patriot Post columnist Bill Federer provided a brief history of our Constitution for a better understanding of the context of this most significant of historical documents.

“Done … the SEVENTEENTH DAY of SEPTEMBER, in the year of our LORD one thousand seven hundred and eighty seven.”

This is the last line of the U.S. Constitution.

Signer of the Constitution James McHenry noted in his diary (American Historical Review, 1906), that after Ben Franklin left the Constitutional Convention, he was asked by Mrs. Elizabeth Powel of Philadelphia: “Well, Doctor, what have we got, a republic or a monarchy?” Franklin replied, “A republic, if you can keep it.”

Webster’s 1828 Dictionary defined “REPUBLIC”: An “exercise of the SOVEREIGN POWER is lodged in representatives elected by THE PEOPLE.”

To help explain, DEMOCRACY has come to have two definitions: one is the general concept of people ruling themselves; the other is an actual system of government.

As an actual system of government, a DEMOCRACY is where THE PEOPLE are KING ruling directly, whereas a REPUBLIC is where THE PEOPLE are KING, ruling through their representatives.

As an actual system of government, a DEMOCRACY only successfully worked on a small basis, like a Greek city-state, where every citizen went to the marketplace everyday to discuss politics.

“Politics” is from the Greek word “polis” which means “the business of the city.” The same word translated into Latin is “civics.”

“Citizen” is also contrasted with “subject.”

Kings have “subjects” who are subjected to their will. Democracies and republics have “citizens.”

“Citizen” is a Greek word which means co-ruler, co-sovereign, co-king. Citizens participate in ruling themselves.

Democracy, as a system of government, is limited in size, as once a city grows so large that citizens cannot come to the market everyday, control is transferred to those who carry news of what is being discussed, which can be slanted one way or another. Republics can grow larger, as citizens spend their time taking care of their families and farms, and representatives go in their place to the market everyday to discuss politics.

A “constitutional republic” is where the representatives are limited by a set of rules approved by the citizens.

Theodore Roosevelt stated October 24, 1903: “In no other place and at no other time has the experiment of government of the people, by the people, for the people, been tried on so vast a scale as here in our own country.”

A republic only lasts as long as the citizens have morals, virtue, and self-control.

John Adams warned October 11, 1798: “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other …”

He added: “We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge … would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net.”

In the Roman Republic, “representatives” were hereditary positions.

The American Republic is a hybrid, where representatives are democratically elected.

Yale President Ezra Stiles stated in 1788: “Most states of all ages … have been founded in rapacity, usurpation and injustice … All the forms of CIVIL POLITY (government systems) have been tried by mankind, EXCEPT ONE: and that seems to have been reserved in Providence to be realized in America.”

John Jay, the first Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, stated September 8, 1777: “The Americans are the first people whom Heaven has favored with an opportunity of deliberating upon, and choosing the forms of government under which they should live. All other constitutions have derived their existence from violence or accidental circumstances.”

Ronald Reagan stated in 1961: “In this country of ours took place the greatest revolution that has ever taken place in the world’s history. Every other revolution simply exchanged one set of rulers for another.”

Declaration signer James Wilson, who also signed the Constitution and was appointed to the Supreme Court by George Washington, remarked at Pennsylvania’s ratifying convention, November 26, 1787: “Governments, in general, have been the result of force, of fraud, and accident. After a period of 6,000 years has elapsed since the creation, the United States exhibit to the world the first instance … of a nation … assembling voluntarily … and deciding calmly concerning that system of government under which they would wish that they and their posterity should live.”

John Adams wrote in his notes on Canon & Feudal Law, 1765: “I always consider the settlement of America with reverence … as the opening of a grand scene and design in Providence for the illumination of the ignorant, and the emancipation of the slavish part of mankind all over the earth.”

In 1802, Daniel Webster stated in a Fourth of July Oration: “The history of the world is before us … The civil, the social, the Christian virtues are requisite to render us worthy the continuation of that government which is the freest on earth.”

After the U.S. Constitution was written, it needed to be ratified by nine states in order to go into effect. Eight states had ratified it, and New Hampshire was in line to be the ninth, but disagreements caused it to stall.

The Governor of New Hampshire declared a Day of Fasting. New Hampshire reconvened its ratifying convention in June of 1788.

Harvard President Rev. Samuel Langdon gave an address which was instrumental in convincing the delegates to ratify the Constitution.

The Portsmouth Daily Evening Times, January 1, 1891, acknowledged Rev. Samuel Langdon’s influence: “… by his voice and example he contributed more perhaps, than any other man to the favorable action of that body.”

Langdon’s address was titled “The REPUBLIC of the ISRAELITES an example to the AMERICAN STATES,” June 5, 1788. In it, he stated: “Instead of the twelve tribes of Israel, we may substitute the thirteen states of the American union, and see this application plainly … That as God in the course of his kind providence hath given you an excellent Constitution of government, founded on the most rational, equitable, and liberal principles, by which all that liberty is secured … and you are impowered to make righteous laws for promoting public order and good morals; and as he has moreover given you by his Son Jesus Christ … a complete revelation of his will … it will be your wisdom … to … adhere faithfully to the doctrines and commands of the gospel, and practice every public and private virtue.”

Langdon continued: “The Israelites may be considered as a pattern to the world in all ages … Government … on republican principles, required laws; without which it must have degenerated immediately into … absolute monarchy … How unexampled was this quick progress of the Israelites, from abject slavery, ignorance, and almost total want of order, to a national establishment perfected in all its parts far beyond all other kingdoms and states! From a mere mob, to a well regulated nation, under a government and laws far superior to what any other nation could boast! …”

Langdon concluded: “It was a long time after the law of Moses was given before the rest of the world knew any thing of government by law … It was six hundred years after Moses before … Grecian republics received a very imperfect … code of laws from Lycurgus. It was about five hundred years from the first founding of the celebrated Roman empire … before the first laws of that empire.”

After Langdon’s address, New Hampshire’s delegates voted to ratify the U.S. Constitution, thus putting it into effect.

Professors Donald S. Lutz and Charles S. Hyneman published an article in American Political Science Review, 1984, titled “The Relative Influence of European Writers on Late 18th-Century American Political Thought.”

They examined nearly 15,000 writings of the 55 writers of the U.S. Constitution, including newspaper articles, pamphlets, books and monographs, and discovered that the Bible, especially the book of Deuteronomy, contributed 34 percent of all direct quotes made by the Founders.

When indirect Bible citations were included, the percentage rose even higher.

Benjamin Franklin wrote to the Editor of the Federal Gazette, April 8, 1788 (The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787, Farrand’s Records, Vol. 3, CXCV, pp. 296-297; Documentary History of the Constitution, IV, 567-571): “I beg I may not be understood to infer, that our general Convention was divinely inspired when it form’d the new federal Constitution … yet I must own I have so much faith in the general government of the world by Providence, that I can hardly conceive a transaction of such momentous importance to the welfare of millions now existing, and to exist in the posterity of a great nation, should be suffered to pass without being in some degree influenc’d, guided and governed by that omnipotent, omnipresent Beneficent Ruler, in whom all inferior spirits live & move and have their being.”

Alexander Hamilton wrote of the Constitution in his Letters of Caesar, 1787: “Whether the New Constitution, if adopted, will prove adequate to such desirable ends, time, the mother of events, will show. For my own part, I sincerely esteem it a system, which, without the finger of God, never could have been suggested and agreed upon by such a diversity of interests.”

George Washington opened the Constitutional Convention, stating: “Let us raise a standard to which the wise and the honest can repair. The event is in the hand of God.”

Harry S Truman wrote in his Memoirs-Volume Two: Years of Trial and Hope: “The men who wrote the Constitution knew … that tyrannical government had come about where the powers of government were united in the hands of one man. The system they set up was designed to prevent a demagogue or ‘a man on horseback’ from taking over the powers of government … The most important thought expressed in our Constitution is that the power of government shall always remain limited, through the separation of powers.”

Ten days after his Inauguration, President Washington wrote to the United Baptist Churches of Virginia, May 10, 1789:

“If I could have entertained the slightest apprehension that the Constitution framed by the Convention, where I had the honor to preside, might possibly endanger the religious rights of any ecclesiastical Society, certainly I would never have placed my signature to it.”

President Washington, the same week Congress passed the Bill of Rights, declared, October 3, 1789: “Whereas both Houses of Congress have by their joint Committee requested me ‘to recommend … a Day of Public Thanksgiving and Prayer to be observed by acknowledging with grateful hearts the many signal favors of Almighty God, especially by affording them an opportunity peaceably to establish a form of government for their safety and happiness’ … I do recommend … the 26th day of November … to be devoted by the People of these United States to the service of that great and glorious Being, who is the beneficent Author of all the good that was, that is, or that will be …”

Washington continued: “That we may then all unite in rendering unto Him our sincere and humble thanks … for the peaceable and rational manner in which we have been enabled to establish constitutions of government for our safety and happiness, and particularly the national one now lately instituted, for the civil and religious liberty with which we are blessed.”

Poet Ralph Waldo Emerson wrote: “America is another name for opportunity. Our whole history appears like a last effort of Divine Providence in behalf of the human race.”

G.K. Chersterton wrote in “What is America” (What I Saw In America, 1922): “America is the only nation in the world that is founded on creed. That creed is set forth … in the Declaration of Independence … that all men are equal in their claim to justice, that governments exist to give them that justice … The Declaration … certainly does condemn … atheism, since it clearly names the Creator as the ultimate authority from whom these equal rights are derived.”

James Madison wrote to Jefferson, October 24, 1787, that writing the Constitution: “… formed a task more difficult than can be well conceived … Adding to these considerations the natural diversity of human opinions on all new and complicated subjects, it is impossible to consider the degree of concord which ultimately prevailed as less than a miracle.”

George Washington wrote to Marquis de Lafayette, February 7, 1788: “As to … the new Constitution … it appears to me, then, little short of a miracle, that the delegates from so many different states … should unite in forming a system of national Government.”

Daniel Webster stated: “Miracles do not cluster. That which has happened but once in six thousand years, cannot be expected to happen often … Hold on, my friends, to the Constitution of your country and the government established under it … Such a government, once destroyed, would have a void to be filled, perhaps for centuries, with evolution and tumult, riot and despotism.”

James Madison wrote in Sept of 1829 (Writings 9:351-57): “The happy Union of these states is a wonder; their Constitution — a miracle; their example the hope of liberty throughout the world. Woe to the ambition that would meditate the destruction of either!”

U.S. Senator Henry Cabot Lodge stated in 1919: “The United States is THE WORLD’S BEST HOPE … Beware how you trifle with your marvelous inheritance … for if we stumble & fall, freedom and civilization everywhere will go down in ruin.”

Indeed.

ICYMI: Biden’s Withdrawal Was Scripted Long Ago

“His decision is … an act of self-sacrifice that places him in the company of George Washington.”

“The spirit of encroachment tends to consolidate the powers of all the departments in one, and thus to create whatever the form of government, a real despotism.” —George Washington (1796)

It’s official: Sunday was National Ice Cream Day!

Oh, and you may have heard that while Joe Biden was napping, his puppeteers decided it would be a great day to drop a social media post saying he was ending his 2024 presidential campaign.

In an announcement posted to X, Biden’s handlers first reminded us of what a great president he has been. You know, except for his long list of disastrous domestic and foreign policy failures.

The post then noted: “While it has been my intention to seek reelection, I believe it is in the best interest of my party and the country for me to stand down and to focus solely on fulfilling my duties as President for the remainder of my term.”

Right … if he makes it to the end of his term. And note the order, “best interest of my party and the country.”

Shortly after announcing his withdrawal, Biden’s handlers then did the only thing they could do on his behalf: They endorsed his sidekick, Kamala Harris. “Today I want to offer my full support and endorsement for Kamala to be the nominee of our party this year,” said Biden’s statement. “Democrats — it’s time to come together and beat Trump. Let’s do this.”

Of course, Biden had already tested positive for “dropping out” two days earlier, then retreated to his Delaware basement. Reportedly, the vaxxed and boosted “Pandemic of the Unvaccinated” President tested positive for the ChiCom Virus.

Predictably, after his announcement he was lauded as the greatest of presidents and a great statesman who fell on his own sword to “save democracy.”

Harris led the pack: “In one term, he has already surpassed the legacy of most presidents who served two terms in office.” Again, if she means their legacy of domestic and foreign policy failures, she is right.

Biden’s spokesparrot, Karine Jean-Pierre, got the memo: “President Biden will go down in history as one of our greatest Presidents. Accomplishing more in 4 years than many accomplished in 8 years. He is also an honorable man. A decent man. And a person who has always put the country first.” Except as noted above, he always puts “party” first.

But my favorites accolades are those from Biden sycophants comparing him to George Washington:

“Joe Biden is precisely the kind of leader George Washington would have hoped for [and] honors George Washington’s example.” —Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY)

“[Like] George Washington…I didn’t have any doubt that Joe would make the patriotic call for the country.” —Senator Tim Kaine (D-VA)

“Like our first president…Biden’s decision to step aside from his reelection run will cement his legacy among some of the greatest statesmen in our country’s history.” —Senator Angus King (I-ME)

“[Biden’s] selfless act this weekend reminds me of what George Washington did when he voluntarily gave up reelection and put country first.” —Congressman Ted Lieu (D-CA)

“[Washington’s legacy] can be President Biden’s legacy as well.” Rep. Seth Moulton (D-MA)

And from his Leftmedia publicists:

“His decision is one of the most remarkable acts of leadership in our history, an act of self-sacrifice that places him in the company of George Washington.” —commentator Jon Meacham

“Joe Biden joins George Washington as America’s second Cincinnatus.” —The Hill’s Rebecca Brannon

“He gets to go out as the George Washington of his party.” —NPR’s Mara Liasson

“He will be remembered as a great president. He will be mentioned in the same sentence as George Washington.” —NBC’s Jonathan Alter

Political analyst Jeff Jacoby rebutted the nonsensical comparisons: “In almost every important way, Washington’s decision was the opposite of Biden’s. Most Americans did not want Biden to run again and did not think he could handle the job. For almost the entirety of his presidency, Biden’s approval rating has been underwater. … Give Biden credit for bowing to the inevitable. But the man is no George Washington.”

More to the point, Gov. Ron DeSantis observed: “This notion that the media is trying to peddle that [Biden] is like George Washington refusing power for the good of the country — he had no choice! They were knifing him in the back!”

Back to reality…

Republicans are rightly demanding that Biden step down now, given that it is clear he does not have the capacity to govern for the rest of his term.

Furthermore, as we have noted before, there is very visceral concern that if Donald Trump wins in November, or if it appears he will win, global evil-doers will accelerate their aggression in the remaining months under the toothless Biden/Harris regime. Putin may advance further into Ukraine, Iran will amp up its nuclear weapons program, and, of greatest concern, Red China could come across the Taiwan Strait.

Sidebar: Who is actually running the executive branch, and who has access to the football, the nuke codes? Just asking for a friend.

Regarding Harris’s role in keeping one of the worst-kept secrets in the history of American politics quiet — that Biden was inept and incompetent — Gov. Ron DeSantis summed up the Republican indictment of her: “Kamala Harris was complicit in a massive coverup to hide and deny the fact that Joe Biden was not capable of discharging the duties of the office. Democrats are just rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.”

So, about those deck chairs… Our team’s managing editor, Nate Jackson, is on leave for the next four weeks, a break we wanted to provide him given he just crossed the 20-year mark with The Patriot Post. However, before leaving last Friday, he staked out his position that Biden’s “medical condition” was a layup for his exit before the weekend was out. Moreover, he said he regretted being gone for our Monday staff meeting because I might pull a Hulk Hogan convention move, ripping my shirt off to remind the crew of what I predicted almost 22 months ago: “Biden Will (NOT) Be the Demo Nominee in 2024.”

Yeah, no shirts were ripped, but Nate was right about the weekend withdrawal. I thought Biden would make it to the convention, during which he would take his name out and the delegates would determine his successor. I suspect Demo strategists decided there was too much risk of a convention fight over who would replace Biden, creating division within the party, so best to announce Harris now.

Looking back, when I first asserted in October of ‘22 that Biden would be out, some readers thought I had taken leave of my senses, resulting in emails over the next 15 months basically saying, “No way; you’re nuts.”

Though I have stood my ground on that assessment every day since then, I have frequently said I hope I am wrong — because I think the Biden/Harris ticket would be the easiest for Donald Trump to defeat.

This week, I have received many inquiries to the effect of, “How did you know?” The short answer is simply a keen sense of the obvious.

Until recently, the mainstream media, both Right and Left, rejected the notion of Biden withdrawing, not because it wasn’t plausible, but because their job is, first and foremost, to endlessly churn speculation in order to sell advertising — yet another reason The Patriot Post is a certified ad-free website.

I have been an analyst in one capacity or another for 45 years, and when it comes to political perspective, I am very deliberate about not immersing myself in any of the endless loops of media churn. Of course, that is what you should expect from a grassroots publication far outside the Beltway media circles.

Consequently, sometimes we can see and say more clearly what the MSM and those stuck in their echo chambers don’t.

Some conservative media outlets claim that six months ago, Trump predicted that Biden would withdraw. I think that Trump and his strategists have been planning on this withdrawal for much longer than that. And despite the preponderance of opinion this week that Biden just succumbed to recent pressure to resign, I think the mechanics of his withdrawal — whom it would be and when — were scripted six to eight months ago.

In other words, millions of Demo primary voters should be, uh, fire-breathing angry for being duped. I mean, Biden spent all but the last three days of the last three years insisting there is no chance he would decline the nomination. Of course, Biden is the consummate “lying dog-faced pony soldier,” and if all those Demos were not predisposed to being duped, they would not be voting Democrat in the first place.

In fact, Demos nullified 14 million primary votes to “secure democracy,” and Harris was out stumping yesterday, insisting her administration will “make sure every vote counts.”

As commentator Ben Shapiro concluded: “Democratic Party bosses and money men tossed out 14 million votes in favor of Joe Biden in the primaries because the polls looked bad. It’s that simple.”

To be clear, Harris will be the nominee, unless she takes herself out, and there’s no way that happens unless she and Hunter Biden have been sharing his White House powder.

Moreover, if she were not the nominee, Demos would have to refund all the money the campaign has raised.

She comes with a ready-made war chest, and because so many BIG Demo donors were withholding their support until Biden departed, in the three days since she became the presumed nominee, they have ponied up more than $230 million.

Biden’s campaign donations plummeted as mega-donors pushed him to quit. But the came roaring back for Kamala.

First and foremost, billionaire leftist George Soros and his son Alex, were quick to endorse Harris and get their big bucks in. Son Alex declared, “Long live the American Dream!”

Of course, all the BIG Demo politicos have endorsed Harris, as have the most notable Demo members of Congress.

All this fanfare aside, inquiring minds want to know: Who brung this post turtle to the dance?

There is an old adage: “If you come across a turtle on a post, you know it didn’t get up there on its own, it doesn’t belong there, its elevated beyond its ability to function, it doesn’t know what to do there, and you gotta wonder what idiot would put it there.”

There are a few folks who are still not sure she should be at the dance.

While Bill and Hillary Clinton were quick to endorse Harris, that other first black president, Barack Obama, did not endorse Harris, perhaps to keep Michelle O’s constituency intact until SHE gives Harris a glowing endorsement at the convention.

Of course, as you may recall, Obama did previously give Harris his personal endorsement, observing she was “by far, the best-looking attorney general” in the nation. You know, kind of the same category of endorsement Obama got from Biden when the latter described the former as “the first mainstream African American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy.”

The New York Times editorial board laments: “[P]arty delegates should have a voice in a decision of this consequence. There are other qualified Democrats who could take on Mr. Trump and win, and picking a candidate without a real contest is how the party got into a position of anointing a standard-bearer that large majorities of Democrats and independents had profound concerns about.”

Perhaps the Times should take a gander at its own delegate map. She has already received the allegiance of more than 3,000 Demo delegates and only needs 1,976 for the nomination.

Moving forward, anyone who assumes Republicans now have the presidency in the bag, as some in conservative echo chambers are predicting, are, well, flat wrong.

Some conservative analysts argue that Harris is the opponent Trump wanted, but as I noted previously, the Biden/Harris ticket was an easier dispatch. With Biden’s “non compos mentis” factor now removed from the equation, that will more than offset concerns about Harris. Thus, I think Trump’s election prospects just got steeper.

Despite the fact Trump currently holds a slight polling lead against Harris, I expect Harris will gain ground in the coming weeks ahead of her DNC coronation. Whether she can hold that ground after the convention, we will see.

The unmitigated fear and hatred of Trump, which Biden/Harris have masterfully cultivated, will keep most Demos in Harris’s voting line.

The election will come down to decisions in the swing states and how effective the Democrats’ massive bulk-mail ballot fraud strategy works this time around.

But as political analyst Byron York notes: “There’s a reason Harris rose in the [2020] race and a reason she fell. The short version is that, for Democratic voters, Harris seemed appealing when she first started her campaign, and then they liked her less and less as they got to know her. Familiarity with the candidate killed her hopes.”

(BTW, there is obvious speculation on who will be Harris’s VP. I think, given that undermining the Second Amendment will be a big part of her campaign, I think she will choose Sen. Mark Kelly (D-AZ), former astronaut and Navy pilot, and husband of former Rep. Gabby Giffords, seriously injured in an armed attack.)

Next up, a column with my assessment of Harris’s qualifications.

Spoiler alert: It ain’t gonna be pretty!

Finally, in the same vein as not getting caught up in all the media churn, don’t let them control the narrative.

This is not about Joe Biden or Kamala Harris; it is about the pervasive threat posed by the socialist Democrat Party to American Liberty.

As political observer Dennis Prager notes: “I have never understood why Republicans always concentrate their fire on their Democratic opponent while ignoring virtually any mention of the threat posed by the Democratic Party and the Left. … ‘The destructive, dangerous Democratic Party has to go.’ That should be — and should have been for decades — the message of every Republican candidate for every office in the land.”

PS: Don’t you dare ask if Kamala Harris is actually constitutionally eligible to be president. Yes, Harris’s citizenship status when born is not clear, giving rise to that pesky question, but the leftist so-called “fact-checkers” will b*tch-slap you into the next universe for asking. However, the question about her citizenship is much more legitimate than what I always considered to be the spurious questions about Obama’s citizenship. But who pays attention to the fallacious errancy of so-called “Birthright Citizenship” these days…

Semper Vigilans Fortis Paratus et Fidelis
Pro Deo et Libertate — 1776

Follow Mark Alexander on X/Twitter.

Hate, Division, and a Resolution to Rise Above

“Seeking God’s blessing and humbling ourselves to receive His Grace and Mercy, transforming ourselves, our communities, our State, and our Nation.”

“We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry, would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” —John Adams (1798)

When I researched the Tennessee legislature’s Joint Resolution 803 in June in preparation for writing about it this month, I had no idea just how relevant and timely it would be.

The attempted assassination of Donald Trump last weekend gave me pause to look at this Joint Resolution, declaring July a Month of Prayer, with a greater sense of urgency. My analysis of that attempt, “Trump, Biden, the Assassin, and the Secret Service,” as well as consideration of Trump’s humble response to his near-death experience, makes it ever more clear that this Resolution is one Trump should recraft when he and J.D. Vance take office next January.

OK, that is hopeful but presumptuous on my part, given we do not actually know yet who the Democrat nominee will be. I still believe the Demo delegates will replace Biden next month — or, more accurately, that he will take himself out of the running, a position I staked out 21 months ago. This prospect seems more likely given Biden’s campaign collapse after last month’s debate and his failed attempts to appear lucid since.

I hope I am wrong because I think the Biden/Harris ticket will be the easiest to defeat. But if Demo delegates do pull a fast switch, that will alleviate constituent concern about Biden’s age, and Trump will have a steeper climb to victory.

Currently, Trump marginally leads Biden in the RCP average of polls — the only polling I consider of value. That has not yet shifted since the assassination attempt, but digging down to state polling, Trump looks stronger.

But the attack on Trump caused, at least for a moment, Biden and his cadre to reconsider their campaign centerpiece — the incessant claims that Trump is a “threat to democracy.”

That rhetorical theme is all Biden has to run on because his policy failures have been a disaster. However, his core constituents are too dullard to distinguish fact from the fictional lies Biden feeds them about Trump’s record — and too blinded by their chronic Trump Derangement Syndrome to care.

Just hours after the Trump attack, Biden pulled all his campaign advertising, including an ad released two days before the attack calling the former president “a dictator” and “a threat to freedom in the United States.”

A Biden campaign official noted: “This changes everything. We’re still assessing. Making the case against Trump, drawing that split screen, will get much harder.” In other words, Biden’s campaign of fear, hate, and division asserting Trump is the “enemy of democracy” hit a wall.

Biden briefly shifted to his “President Unity” facade in an effort to divert attention from his incendiary campaign rhetoric.

However, asked on Monday — the day the GOP convention convened and two days after the assassination attempt — if the Biden campaign message was going to change, his deputy campaign manager Quentin Fulks said, “It hasn’t changed.”

To that end, resuming his divisive rhetoric this week, Biden declared: “How do you talk about the threat to democracy, which is real…? Do you just not say anything because it may incite somebody?” Biden insisted out of one side of his mouth, “Our politics have become too heated,” adding, “We all have a responsibility to lower the temperature.” Then out of the other side, he affirmed he will keep the heat on high: “Just because we must lower the temperature in our politics as it relates to violence doesn’t mean we should stop telling the truth.”

As I have noted, Trump’s campaign rhetoric is equally strident, but Trump is focused on Biden’s failed domestic and foreign policy record, not calling Biden a traitor to “democracy” and an enemy of the people. In fact, when Trump was shot, he was turning toward a panel listing the massive illegal immigration under Biden. Had he not turned toward that graphic, he would likely have suffered a fatal wound.

Fact is, Trump actually has an exceptional record to run on, despite the plethora of unmitigated lies Biden constantly regurgitates about the MAGA record — virtually none of which are subject to so-called “fact-checks” by his fawning Leftmedia publicists.

So, what does this have to do with a Joint Resolution 803 in Tennessee?

Tennessee Republican Gov. Bill Lee signed a Resolution asking citizens to pray and fast for the month of July, a resolution in keeping with those of our founding era. Both chambers overwhelmingly approved the Resolution, which passed in the Senate 27-1 and in the House 82-6.

The Resolution affirms that “God, as Creator,” has the “authority to judge and bless” the states and our nation, acknowledging that our leaders must seek “the Creator’s favor,” much as President John Adams did in 1799. The Resolution quotes that proclamation:

[This day] be observed throughout the United States of America as a day of solemn humiliation, fasting, and prayer; that the citizens on that day abstain, as far as may be, from their secular occupation, and devote the time to the sacred duties of religion, in public and in private; that they call to mind our numerous offenses against the most high God, confess them before Him with the sincerest penitence, implore his pardoning mercy, through the Great Mediator and Redeemer, for our past transgressions, and that through the grace of His Holy Spirit, we may be disposed and enabled to yield a more suitable obedience to his righteous requisitions in time to come; that He would interpose to arrest the progress of that impiety and licentiousness in principle and practice so offensive to Himself and so ruinous to mankind; that He would make us deeply sensible that “righteousness exalteth a nation, but sin is a reproach to any people.” [Proverbs 14:34]

This Resolution is in the mold of our nation’s the great founding resolutions, which you can read on our Historic Documents page. Its kinship to those resolutions affirms our devotion to American Liberty.

The Resolution continues:

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that we call upon all those who are physically able and spiritually inclined to do so to join in a thirty-day season of prayer and intermittent fasting as we begin a new fiscal year as a means of seeking God’s blessing and humbling ourselves to receive His Grace and Mercy, transforming ourselves, our communities, our State, and our Nation.

That stands in stark contrast to national declarations of June as the so-called “Pride Month,” though there is evidence that public support for the leftist gender-confusion agenda is showing signs of decline.

The Resolution notes specific issues that our nation faces, including surging violence committed by citizens and noncitizens, failure of public schools, the epidemic of drug and alcohol addiction, overdose deaths from fentanyl being muled across our southern border, human trafficking, children suffering from broken homes, and corruption of our federal government.

letter from the Resolution sponsors invites citizens to “read or have HJR 803 read in our church services; Examine our lives in light of God’s Word and confess of our sins; Acknowledge that we, as the Church, have failed to stand for the principles of God, ask for His Forgiveness and Mercy, and commit to stand firmly on those principles going forward; For those who are able, join in prayer and intermittent fasting as a means of demonstrating our desire for repentance.”

Contacting Bill Lee, our State Senator Bo Watson, and district Representative Patsy Hazelwood for comment on their support of the measure served as a reminder of why I take great pride in our family’s historic Tennessee ancestry, as well as the rise of good and righteous political leadership across our state — the “Great State of Tennessee” now being among the most conservative in the nation.

Gov. Lee, a man of strong faith, responded: “I’m proud to join the General Assembly in recognizing July as a month of prayer and fasting as we thank God for his many blessings, ask his forgiveness for our shortcomings, seek his wisdom in all circumstances, and ask for continued favor upon the great State of Tennessee.”

Sen. Watson responded: “The vast majority of Tennesseans believe in the power of prayer and supplication. HJR 803 states many of the spiritual values that we hold dear in our Great State and reaffirms our belief in a Creator and his presence in our daily lives as individuals, a state and a nation. As the psalmist writes in Psalms 22:28, ‘for dominion belongs to the Lord and He rules over the nations.’”

Rep. Hazelwood responded: “Ephesians 6:18 says, ‘And pray in the Spirit on all occasions with all kinds of prayers and requests. With this in mind, be alert and always keep on praying for all the Lord’s people.’ Our state and country today are facing some very difficult issues, you might say evils. I think we have proven we cannot solve these challenging times or overcome these evils solely on our human efforts. Like John Adams, I believe we need to recognize that if America is to continue to be favored by the Lord, then we must reaffirm the foundation on which our nation was founded. We must turn to God, and this resolution calls on us, as God-fearing citizens, to do just that, as only He can heal our country.”

A friend and former legislator, Chris Clem, summed up the Resolution: “Like John Adams, we need to recognize that if America is to continue to be favored by the Lord, then America has to remember our foundation of faith. This resolution calls on us as God-fearing citizens to fear and honor God. Only God can heal our land. This resolution is designed to call on God — not voters.”

Amen.

Trump and Vance, take note!

A 1776 John Adams quote provides a good bookend: “I am well aware of the Toil and Blood and Treasure, that it will cost Us to maintain this Declaration, and support and defend these States. Yet through all the Gloom I can see the Rays of ravishing Light and Glory. I can see that the End is more than worth all the Means. And that Posterity will tryumph in that Days Transaction, even altho We should rue it, which I trust in God We shall not.”

Through all the contemporary gloom, I still believe as Ronald Reagan did: “America’s best days are yet to come. Our proudest moments are yet to be. Our most glorious achievements are just ahead.”

Stand firm and fast, fellow Patriots!

Semper Vigilans Fortis Paratus et Fidelis
Pro Deo et Libertate — 1776

Follow Mark Alexander on X/Twitter.

Comment | Share